Placing Membership

By James Dennison

The scriptures indicate that Christians should be not only a part of the “universal church”, but also a part of a “local church”. When Paul arrived at Jerusalem , he endeavored to “join himself” to the disciples there (Acts 9:26). Paul and Barnabas later became “identified” with the church at Antioch (Acts 11:26, 13:1).

Though it is conceivable that conditions may exist, where for a time one is a member only of the “universal church” (Acts 8:35-39), he should, as soon as possible, become “identified” with a “local church”, as did Paul and Barnabas (Phil. 4:9). If there is not a faithful congregation of the Lord’s people meeting in that area, he should begin one. Thus, the idea that one can be a member of a “local church” where he has not worshipped for weeks, months, and sometimes years, is denominational in origin and unscriptural in concept.

Some, to avoid responsibilities and discipline will become “floating members”; just visiting around from place to place, never “identifying” with any one congregation. If these people become needful of discipline, and are approached by the elders of any of the congregations where they attend, their immediate reply is; “but, we’re not members of your congregation!”

Therefore, to eliminate this, when we move to another town, or permanently sever our connection with a congregation, we should find another faithful congregation of the Lord’s people and “join” ourselves to them; settle down and go to work.

Also, we should not lightly sever our connection with one congregation and “place membership” with another. Naturally, if we move from one town to another, it becomes essential that we do so at once. Sometime we may deem it necessary to become part of another “local church” within the same general area where we have previously worked and worshipped because:

1.   We feel it necessary for our own spiritual growth.

2.   We feel that such will enable us to be more effective and useful for the Lord.

3.   There are unscriptural doctrines and/or practices in the former congregation, which we are unable to correct. However; let us be sure that we can sub­stantiate our claim of such.

4.   There is such a strong difference of opinion as to the advisability — not scripturalness — of a particular work or activity that we feel it is better for peace and harmony that we work and worship elsewhere (Acts 15:36-41). If this is the reason, when at all possible, we should “forbear” with one another (Eph. 4:2).

5.   We have been unscripturally and unjustifiable “withdrawn” from and are unable to get the mistake corrected. This sometimes happens. But let’s be positive it is they that are wrong, and not us! Also, that we have done ALL in our power to rectify the error!

When we leave one congregation and become “joined” to another, we should be ENTIRELY POSITIVE that our motives are honest and justifiable. It should never be done:

1.   To put pressure on the former congregation to honor our particular whim.

2.   Because the truth has been preached and our toes thereby stepped on.

3.   To escape discipline or responsibilities.

4.   Through jealousy and envy because we have been passed over for some particular work. If it be for such reasons as these, we will soon be dissatisfied with the new congregation!

When one “identifies” himself with a congregation, he should be admitted into the fellowship of that “local church”. If there seems any reason to doubt or question his previous faithfulness, the elders should exert every effort possible to satisfy themselves that this person is faithful and not in need of restoration. If it is found that he has not been faithful, or transferred membership to escape needed discipline, then the church should institute disciplinary action against this new member just as they would against any other. Likewise, if we seek to sever our connection with one congregation that we may be “joined” to a religious body in error, the elders have no course open but to begin disciplinary procedure. (Via the Beacon - Electronic Edition - 2/15/2011)

Divine Providence (Part 3)

By Bob Myhan

God gave man the ability to make free will decisions. Of course, He can and may influence those decisions in any number of ways. This would not be difficult since He has all of nature at His disposal.

Remember, nature came into existence by His will, was organized by His will and is both balanced and regulated by His will.

God could have controlled the rainfall at both Shechem and Dothan , so the grazing lands of the latter would be more lush than those of the former. This, of course, would influence the decision of Joseph’s brothers to move the flock.

God could also just as easily have influenced the decisions of Potiphar, Potiphar’s wife and the jailer because there is nothing too hard for God (Jer. 32:17).

Finally, God could have influenced the decision of Pharaoh to put his butler and baker into prison, so they would meet Joseph.

Inasmuch as all civil governments function through a man or a group of men, God can influence civil governments by influencing those who govern. He can also influence civil government by influencing the governed. By influencing Pharaoh’s butler, for example, He influenced Pharaoh. And by influencing Pharaoh, He influenced all of Egypt .

Paul wrote,

Let every soul be subject to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and the authorities that exist are appointed by God. Therefore whoever resists the authority resists the ordinance of God, and those who resist will bring judgment on themselves. For rulers are not a terror to good works, but to evil. Do you want to be unafraid of the authority? Do what is good, and you will have praise from the same. For he is God's minister to you for good. But if you do evil, be afraid; for he does not bear the sword in vain; for he is God's minister, an avenger to execute wrath on him who practices evil. Therefore you must be subject, not only because of wrath but also for conscience' sake. For because of this you also pay taxes, for they are God's ministers attending continually to this very thing. ( Rom. 13:1-6)

Thus, we see that God ordained “the governing authorities.” But when did He do so? He did so when He said to Noah after the flood, "Whoever sheds man's blood, By man his blood shall be shed; For in the image of God He made man” (Gen. 9:6).

In this statement, God implicitly authorized at least two branches of civil government—executive and judicial—the first to investigate suspicious deaths and execute those guilty of murder, and the second to determine the guilt of murder suspects.

Not only did God authorize civil government but He also has been active therein.

...He removes kings and raises up kings” (Dan. 2:21).

...the Most High rules in the kingdom of men, and gives it to whomever He chooses" (Dan. 4:32).

 God used Pharaoh to accomplish His purpose of bringing Israel out of captivity so that He, rather than man, would receive the glory. God hardened Pharaoh’s heart by giving Pharaoh the opportunity to harden his own heart (Ex. 8:32; 9:12).

For the Scripture says to Pharaoh, "For this very purpose I have raised you up, that I may show My power in you, and that My name may be declared in all the earth." (Rom. 9:17; Josh. 2:1-13)

God promised to bless Jeroboam and the kingdom of Israel if he would keep the statutes and commandments of God (1 Kings 11:37-38). But Jeroboam did not do so. God still used the Northern kingdom as an example of what happens to those nations that choose to do other than God’s will (Isa. 9:8-21; 10:1-4).

“So I will take you, and you shall reign over all your heart desires, and you shall be king over Israel . Then it shall be, if you heed all that I command you, walk in My ways, and do what is right in My sight, to keep My statutes and My commandments, as My servant David did, then I will be with you and build for you an enduring house, as I built for David, and will give Israel to you.” (1 Kings 11:37-38)

The nations accomplish God’s purposes (Acts 4:25-28) though He does not force them to do good or evil (Jer. 18:7-10).

God has used civil governments in the accomplishment of His purposes. He has worked among them, ruling them indirectly through their several kings. He used Israel to disseminate the knowledge of Him and to preserve the seed of Abraham until “the fullness of the times.” He even used other nations to punish Israel when they deserved punishment, though He never violated the free will of any ruler. &